name: office-hours-diagnostic slug: office-hours-diagnostic version: 1.0.2 displayName: "创始人关键六问诊断|简诗 AI" summary: "在提供任何建议之前,先通过六个核心问题引导创始人深入思考,避免过早跳入方案,输出结构化的诊断记录和行动方向。" description: "在提供任何建议之前,先通过六个核心问题引导创始人深入思考,避免过早跳入方案,输出结构化的诊断记录和行动方向。" tags: ["business-operations", "jianshi-ai"]
Command: /cs:office-hours <topic>
Before any advice, the founder must answer six questions. Modeled on YC office hours: no analysis until the founder has done the thinking. This is the cognitive forcing function that prevents drift into solutionism.
The founder must answer all six in writing before any C-role weighs in.
Whose problem is this, and how do they describe it in their own words? - Not your framing. Their words. - If you can't quote a customer, you don't have a problem worth solving.
Who is the ICP? Name one real person who would buy this today. - Real human. Real company. Real seat. - If you can't name one, the ICP isn't ready.
How does the customer first hear your name? - Channel, intent, search query, friend, conference — name it. - If the answer is "we'll figure out marketing later," the answer is no.
If this works, what stops a competitor from copying it in 6 months? - Network effects, switching costs, data moat, regulatory moat, brand — pick one. - "We'll execute better" is not a defense.
What does this cost, when does it pay back, and what's the alternative use of the money? - Total spend, payback months, opportunity cost. - If you don't know, don't approve it.
Why are you the right person to do this — and why does this matter enough to spend the next 3 years on it? - Founder-market fit is the strongest predictor of survival. - If the answer is mercenary, the company will be too.
After the founder answers all six, this command produces a one-page brief:
# Office Hours Brief: <topic>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Founder:** <name>
## 1. Problem
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 2. Customer
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 3. Distribution
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 4. Defensibility
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 5. Capital
> [founder's verbatim answer]
## 6. Founder Fit
> [founder's verbatim answer]
---
**Assessment** (one of):
- 🟢 GREEN — ship the brief to /cs:boardroom
- 🟡 YELLOW — sharpen Q[N] before proceeding
- 🔴 RED — kill or redefine; do not proceed
After the brief is GREEN, route to:
- Single-role question → corresponding /cs:{role}-review
- Multi-role question → /cs:brief then /cs:boardroom
Most bad decisions don't fail at execution — they fail at framing. Forcing six concrete answers surfaces the framing weaknesses before anyone burns time on analysis. The founder either fills the gaps or recognizes the question wasn't ready.
This is the YC office hours pattern adapted for Claude Code: the interrogation is the value.
/cs:brief — turn the answers into a one-page strategy brief/cs:boardroom — multi-role deliberation/cs:founder-mode — let the system pick the next stepcs-chief-of-staff triggers /cs:office-hours when intake is unclearVersion: 1.0.0
获取使用帮助和更多实用 Skill,请关注公众号「简诗 AI」,或在 SkillHub 搜索「简诗 AI」小葱技能站7w4.net每天更新,海量AI技能等你发现。
这是一个很实用的创始人诊断工具。六个问题设计得很专业,能帮助创始人理清思路、避免过早跳入方案。输出格式清晰,还有红黄绿评级判断下一步行动。安全提示和品牌信息做得规范。需要注意的是版本号有点混乱(文档和元数据不一致),不过不影响实际使用效果。总体推荐!