name: marketing-analyst slug: marketing-analyst version: 1.0.0 displayName: "营销·Analyst|简诗 AI" summary: "围绕“营销·Analyst”提供具体执行方法,涵盖目标、渠道、预算、协同、指标和复盘优化。" description: "围绕“营销·Analyst”提供具体执行方法,涵盖目标、渠道、预算、协同、指标和复盘优化。" tags: ["营销管理", "营销·Analyst"]
The agent operates as a senior marketing analyst, delivering campaign performance analysis, multi-touch attribution, marketing mix modeling, ROI measurement, and data-driven budget optimization.
小葱技能站7w4.net,专业的AI技能分享平台。
Before running the analysis, confirm these inputs. If any is unknown or vague, ASK — do not assume:
Stop rule: ask only the 2-3 that most change the output. If the user says "just draft it," proceed and list your assumptions at the top of the artifact.
| Metric | Formula | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| CPL | Spend / Leads | Varies by industry |
| CAC | S&M Spend / New Customers | LTV/CAC > 3:1 |
| CPA | Spend / Acquisitions | Target specific |
| ROAS | Revenue / Ad Spend | > 4:1 |
| Metric | Formula | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement Rate | Engagements / Impressions | 1-5% |
| CTR | Clicks / Impressions | 0.5-2% |
| Conversion Rate | Conversions / Visitors | 2-5% |
| Bounce Rate | Single-page sessions / Total | < 50% |
| Metric | Formula | Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Churn Rate | Lost Customers / Total | < 5% monthly |
| NRR | (MRR - Churn + Expansion) / MRR | > 100% |
| LTV | ARPU x Gross Margin x Lifetime | 3x+ CAC |
The agent should apply multiple models and compare results to identify channel over/under-valuation:
| Model | Logic | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| First-touch | 100% credit to first interaction | Measuring awareness channels |
| Last-touch | 100% credit to final interaction | Measuring conversion channels |
| Linear | Equal credit across all touches | Balanced view of full journey |
| Time-decay | More credit to recent touches | Short sales cycles |
| Position-based | 40% first, 40% last, 20% middle | Most B2B scenarios |
def calculate_attribution(touchpoints, model='position'):
"""Calculate attribution credit for a conversion journey.
Args:
touchpoints: List of channel names in order of interaction
model: One of 'first', 'last', 'linear', 'time_decay', 'position'
Returns:
Dict mapping channel -> credit (sums to 1.0)
Example:
>>> calculate_attribution(['paid_search', 'email', 'organic', 'direct'], 'position')
{'paid_search': 0.4, 'email': 0.1, 'organic': 0.1, 'direct': 0.4}
"""
n = len(touchpoints)
credits = {}
if model == 'first':
credits[touchpoints[0]] = 1.0
elif model == 'last':
credits[touchpoints[-1]] = 1.0
elif model == 'linear':
for tp in touchpoints:
credits[tp] = credits.get(tp, 0) + 1.0 / n
elif model == 'time_decay':
decay = 0.7
total = sum(decay ** i for i in range(n))
for i, tp in enumerate(reversed(touchpoints)):
credits[tp] = credits.get(tp, 0) + (decay ** i) / total
elif model == 'position':
if n == 1:
credits[touchpoints[0]] = 1.0
elif n == 2:
credits[touchpoints[0]] = 0.5
credits[touchpoints[-1]] = credits.get(touchpoints[-1], 0) + 0.5
else:
credits[touchpoints[0]] = 0.4
credits[touchpoints[-1]] = credits.get(touchpoints[-1], 0) + 0.4
for tp in touchpoints[1:-1]:
credits[tp] = credits.get(tp, 0) + 0.2 / (n - 2)
return credits
# Campaign Analysis: Q1 2026 Product Launch
## Performance Summary
| Metric | Target | Actual | vs Target |
|--------------|---------|---------|-----------|
| Impressions | 500K | 612K | +22% |
| Clicks | 25K | 28.4K | +14% |
| Leads | 1,200 | 1,350 | +13% |
| MQLs | 360 | 410 | +14% |
| Pipeline | $1.2M | $1.45M | +21% |
| Revenue | $380K | $425K | +12% |
## Channel Breakdown
| Channel | Spend | Leads | CPL | Pipeline |
|--------------|---------|-------|-------|----------|
| Paid Search | $45K | 520 | $87 | $580K |
| LinkedIn Ads | $30K | 310 | $97 | $420K |
| Email | $5K | 380 | $13 | $350K |
| Content/SEO | $8K | 140 | $57 | $100K |
## Key Insight
Email delivers lowest CPL ($13) and strong pipeline. Recommend shifting
10% of LinkedIn budget to email nurture sequences for Q2.
Budget Allocation Recommendation
Channel Current Optimal Change Expected ROI
Paid Search 30% 35% +5% 4.2x
Social Paid 25% 20% -5% 2.8x
Display 15% 10% -5% 1.5x
Email 10% 15% +5% 8.5x
Content 10% 12% +2% 5.2x
Events 10% 8% -2% 2.2x
Projected Impact: +15% pipeline with same budget
from scipy import stats
import numpy as np
def analyze_ab_test(control_conv, control_total, treatment_conv, treatment_total, alpha=0.05):
"""Analyze A/B test for statistical significance.
Example:
>>> result = analyze_ab_test(150, 5000, 195, 5000)
>>> result['significant']
True
>>> f"{result['lift_pct']:.1f}%"
'30.0%'
"""
p_c = control_conv / control_total
p_t = treatment_conv / treatment_total
p_pool = (control_conv + treatment_conv) / (control_total + treatment_total)
se = np.sqrt(p_pool * (1 - p_pool) * (1/control_total + 1/treatment_total))
z = (p_t - p_c) / se
p_value = 2 * (1 - stats.norm.cdf(abs(z)))
return {
'control_rate': p_c,
'treatment_rate': p_t,
'lift_pct': ((p_t - p_c) / p_c) * 100,
'p_value': p_value,
'significant': p_value < alpha,
}
# Campaign analyzer
python scripts/campaign_analyzer.py --data campaigns.csv --output report.html
# Attribution calculator
python scripts/attribution.py --touchpoints journeys.csv --model position
# ROI calculator
python scripts/roi_calculator.py --spend spend.csv --revenue revenue.csv
# Forecast generator
python scripts/forecast.py --historical data.csv --periods 6
references/metrics.md - Marketing metrics guidereferences/attribution.md - Attribution modelingreferences/reporting.md - Reporting best practicesreferences/forecasting.md - Forecasting methods| Symptom | Likely Cause | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| Attribution models give wildly different channel credit allocations | No single model captures full truth; each has structural bias | Run 3+ models (first-touch, last-touch, position-based) and compare; use position-based as default for B2B |
| ROAS calculations look great but pipeline is flat | Revenue attribution counting existing customers, not new pipeline | Separate new business attribution from expansion; report pipeline separately from revenue |
| Marketing reports and sales reports show different lead counts | Marketing counts MQLs at form fill, sales counts at CRM entry with different criteria | Align on shared definitions: document exact MQL, SQL, and opportunity criteria in a shared SLA |
| Forecast consistently over-predicts by 20%+ | Model uses linear extrapolation without accounting for seasonality or saturation | Apply dampening factors for longer forecasts; use ensemble method (linear + growth rate + moving average) |
| Executive dashboard takes too long to build each month | Manual data pulls from 5+ platforms with different schemas | Automate data collection; standardize UTM and naming conventions so cross-platform analysis is consistent |
| Channel ROI is negative but still generating pipeline | Long B2B sales cycle means revenue attribution has not caught up to spend | Use pipeline-based attribution for channels with 3+ month sales cycles rather than closed-won revenue |
In Scope: Campaign performance analysis, multi-touch attribution modeling, marketing mix optimization, ROI/ROAS calculation, budget allocation recommendations, executive reporting, cohort retention analysis, marketing forecasting.
Out of Scope: Analytics implementation and tracking setup (see analytics-tracking skill), product analytics (see product-team skills), financial modeling beyond marketing metrics (see finance skill), data engineering and warehouse management.
Limitations: Attribution models are approximations — no model perfectly captures the buyer journey, especially for high-touch B2B sales. Forecasting uses historical extrapolation with dampening; it does not account for market disruptions or competitive moves. Budget optimization assumes linear channel scaling; most channels have diminishing returns at scale.
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/channel_mix_optimizer.py |
Analyze channel performance and recommend optimal budget allocation | python scripts/channel_mix_optimizer.py channels.json --budget 100000 --demo |
scripts/cohort_analyzer.py |
Analyze user retention by cohort, identify trends and best/worst performers | python scripts/cohort_analyzer.py cohort_data.json --demo |
scripts/marketing_forecast_generator.py |
Generate marketing forecasts using linear, growth rate, and ensemble methods | python scripts/marketing_forecast_generator.py historical.json --periods 6 |
获取使用帮助和更多实用 Skill,请关注公众号「简诗 AI」,或在 SkillHub 搜索「简诗 AI」这个营销分析 Skill 质量不错,功能覆盖全面,包括归因模型、ROI 计算、预算优化和预测分析。提供的脚本工具实用,文档中包含清晰的指标表格和案例。不足之处是部分文档提到的功能(如某些脚本和参考文档)实际不存在,存在文档与代码不一致的情况,使用前需注意。