name: knowledge-lib displayName: Knowledge Lib description: > Personal knowledge wiki manager. Organizes notes into structured .md wiki with concept pages, summaries, and cross-references. Activate when user says "add to wiki", asks to query knowledge base, or mentions "knowledge base". version: 1.2.0 metadata: permissions: - file:read - file:write behavior: network: none telemetry: none credentials: none

Knowledge Lib

Personal knowledge wiki at ~/.openclaw/workspace/knowledge/.

Quick Start

1. User says "add to wiki" with a link or file → agent saves + summarizes it
2. User says "look up X" → agent searches wiki pages and answers with citations
3. User says "wiki status" → agent reports wiki health stats

Directory Structure

knowledge/
├── raw/<category>/        # Source documents (read-only)
├── wiki/
│   ├── index.md           # Content catalog (refreshed on every write)
│   ├── log.md             # Chronological operation log (append-only)
│   ├── concepts/          # Concept pages (PascalCase: Self-Distillation.md)
│   ├── summaries/         # Document summaries (date-slug.md)
│   └── analyses/          # Query writeback results (date-query-slug.md)
└── output/                # Generated outputs (slides, charts)
7w4.net收录了海量优质技能插件。

Categories: ai-llm, engineering, products, startups

Schema Conventions

Frontmatter (all wiki pages)

---
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
related: [[Concept-A]], [[Concept-B]]
sources: N
tags: [tag1, tag2]
status: active        # active | superseded | disputed
---

Naming Rules

• Concepts: PascalCase → Self-Distillation.md, RAG.md
• Summaries: YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md
• Analyses: YYYY-MM-DD-query-<slug>.md

Cross-references

• Wiki-links: [[ConceptName]] (Obsidian compatible)
• Source citation: [[YYYY-MM-DD-summary-slug]]
• Dispute mark: ⚠️ [[ConceptName#disputed]] when new data challenges old claims

Status Lifecycle

• active → current knowledge
• superseded → newer source proved this wrong (keep with link to replacement)
• disputed → conflicting evidence, needs resolution

Content Type Guide

When user sends a link or document, classify by content type:

Action: save to raw/<category>/, then summarize and link concepts.

Workflow

Save (trigger: user command "add to wiki")

1. Read the provided content or link
2. Save to raw/<category>/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md with frontmatter
3. Log in log.md: ## [YYYY-MM-DD] save | <Title> | <category>
4. Proceed to Summarize step

Summarize (trigger: after save)

1. Read the raw document, identify key points
2. Write summary to wiki/summaries/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>.md
3. Contradiction check: Compare new claims against existing active concepts
4. If conflict: mark old as disputed, link both pages
5. If reinforcement: update existing page, increment sources
6. Create or update wiki/concepts/<Concept>.md
7. Add [[backlinks]] between related concept pages
8. Refresh index.md
9. Log: ## [YYYY-MM-DD] summarize | <Title> | touched N pages

Query (trigger: user asks "look up X")

1. Search wiki/concepts/ and wiki/summaries/ for matches
2. Answer with source citations
3. If the answer is substantial → write to wiki/analyses/ and update links
4. Log: ## [YYYY-MM-DD] query | <Topic> | sources: N

Health Check (trigger: user says "wiki status")

1. Count unprocessed raw docs, orphan pages, missing frontmatter
2. Report stats summary
3. Optionally do deep-lint: contradiction scan, stale claims, missing concepts

Quick Commands

Templates

Concept Page

---
created: YYYY-MM-DD
updated: YYYY-MM-DD
related: [[Concept-A]], [[Concept-B]]
sources: N
tags: [category]
status: active
---
# Concept Name

## Definition
One sentence.

## Key Points
- ...

## Contradictions
- ⚠️ [[YYYY-MM-DD-summary-slug]] challenges: <brief>

## Sources
- [[YYYY-MM-DD-summary-slug]]

Summary Page

---
source: <URL>
category: <category>
concepts: [[Concept-A]], [[Concept-B]]
imported: YYYY-MM-DD
---
# Title

## Core Points
- ...

## Key Data
- ...

Analysis Page

---
created: YYYY-MM-DD
query: <Original question>
concepts: [[Concept-A]], [[Concept-B]]
sources: N
---
# <Question Summary>

## Answer
...

## Key Insights
- ...

这个 Skill 整体质量不错，文档写得很详细，功能设计也很系统化。它能帮你管理个人知识库，支持保存网页、生成摘要、查询检索、质量检查等操作。优点是结构规范、使用简单，缺点是目前只是基础框架，缺少一些高级功能，实际使用可能还需要手动调整一些细节。适合对知识管理有需求且愿意花时间配置的用户。