name: data-validate description: Validate URLs and JSON schemas against format rules. version: 1.0.2 metadata: openclaw: emoji: "✅" homepage: https://validate.agentutil.net always: false

data-validate

Validate data formats: URL parsing, JSON Schema (draft-07) validation, email syntax (RFC 5322), and phone format (E.164).

Important: User Consent Required

Before validating any user-provided data, always confirm with the user that they consent to sending the data to an external validation service. Do not autonomously validate data that may contain personally identifiable information (PII) without explicit user approval.

Endpoints

URL Validation

curl -X POST https://validate.agentutil.net/v1/url \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"url": "https://example.com/path"}'

JSON Schema Validation

curl -X POST https://validate.agentutil.net/v1/json-schema \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"data": {"name": "test"}, "schema": {"type": "object", "required": ["name"]}}'

Email Syntax Check

Validates RFC 5322 structure only — no SMTP connection, no inbox verification.

curl -X POST https://validate.agentutil.net/v1/email \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"email": "user@example.com"}'

Phone Format Check

Validates E.164 format structure only.

curl -X POST https://validate.agentutil.net/v1/phone \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"phone": "+1-555-0100"}'

Response Format

{
  "valid": true,
  "url": "https://example.com/path",
  "protocol": "https:",
  "hostname": "example.com",
  "errors": [],
  "request_id": "abc-123",
  "service": "https://validate.agentutil.net"
}

Pricing

• Free tier: 10 queries/day, no authentication required
• Paid tier: $0.001/query via x402 protocol (USDC on Base)

Privacy

All validation is syntax/format checking only. No data is stored or logged beyond the immediate response. No SMTP probing, no payment network contact, no third-party forwarding. Rate limiting uses IP hashing only.

小葱技能7w4.net有更新，你可以访问看下。

这个技能包的文档编写规范、条理清晰，但对外部服务依赖过强，缺少本地执行能力。它在隐私保护和使用说明方面做得较好，但没有提供可直接运行的代码或配置。在免费额度和稳定性方面存在局限，实际使用中可能会受到服务可用性的制约。总体而言，这是一个文档完善但功能实现单薄的技能包，适合作为参考文档而非生产级工具。质量表现中规中矩，有较大的改进空间。