name: codex-mcp-dev description: Use the local Codex CLI through mcporter and codex-mcp-server for real coding work in the current project. Use when the user asks to build features, fix bugs, refactor code, debug failures, write or update tests, review implementation options, or otherwise delegate non-trivial development work to the machine-local Codex installation.
Use the local Codex installation through the wrapper script at {baseDir}/scripts/codex_mcp.py.
This gives a stable path:
OpenClaw → mcporter → codex-mcp-server → local codex
Install prerequisites first:
mcportercodexcodex-mcpCreate the project MCP entry if config/mcporter.json does not exist yet:
mcporter config add codex-cli --scope project --command codex-mcp
This skill expects a workspace-local MCP server named codex-cli.
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/codex_mcp.py doctorask without --full-autoask --full-auto--cwd to the target repo or project directory.python3 {baseDir}/scripts/codex_mcp.py doctor
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/codex_mcp.py version
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/codex_mcp.py ask \
--cwd /absolute/path/to/repo \
--full-auto \
--prompt "Implement the requested change, update tests, and summarize what changed."
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/codex_mcp.py ask \
--cwd /absolute/path/to/repo \
--sandbox-mode read-only \
--approval-policy never \
--prompt "Explain the bug, identify likely root cause, and propose the smallest safe fix."
python3 {baseDir}/scripts/codex_mcp.py ask \
--cwd /absolute/path/to/repo \
--full-auto \
--prompt-file /tmp/codex-task.txt
Include as many of these as possible:
Prefer prompts like:
tests/api.test.ts without changing public behavior. Run the relevant tests and summarize the root cause."src/cache.py for readability, keep behavior identical, and add regression tests for TTL edge cases."server/ and identify the top 3 correctness risks with concrete file references."--full-auto for ordinary implementation work.--yolo unless the user explicitly wants aggressive execution.--cwd; do not run against the wrong directory.这个 Skill 质量不错,文档写得很详细清楚,操作流程设计合理。优点是功能划分清晰,有健康检查和多种使用模式,安全建议也很到位。缺点是配置依赖较多,新手上手需要先装一堆工具;文件结构太简单,缺少示例文件参考。总体适合有一定经验的开发者使用。